Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

The thought police at YouTube and elsewhere are like WW1 generals fighting the last war rather than the current one.

It is much like the current artless effort by the corporate media to claim that Kamala Harris was never a "border czar" even though it was corporate media itself that originally applied the term to her role on border issues and immigration.

https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/kamala-harris-border-czar

The thought police at YouTube fail to account for all the ways content can be archived across the Internet. Believing they are still the gatekeepers of information, they are defending the narrative rather than engage with the idea. Instead of responding to factual claims and challenges to their preferred narrative, they think they can simply silence the critics.

What they fail to realize is that, because the data often does survive their efforts to erase it, the censorship strips away the moral legitimacy of their position. They are taking a torch to their own credibility and will not realize the damage they are doing to themselves until it is too late.

Expand full comment
JdL's avatar

It's bad enough getting shamed when you've actually said or done something wrong; here you're getting shamed (censored) for telling the truth. Very frustrating! I hope Bob M will start using Rumble, either with or without YouTube in addition: as far as I know, they don't censor.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts